A static site that is still easy to change.

Publish fast static pages without giving up everyday content editing. Pocketloom pairs a tailored CMS with reviewable agent-prepared changes, so the public site stays simple while your team can keep it current.

Static, fast, editable

The site is fast for visitors and simple for you to update.

Pocketloom sites are built as static Astro output and deployed at the edge. A tailored CMS handles agreed content fields before publication. Larger agent-prepared changes go through a private preview and approval before a new static version goes live.

Build pathStatic output
Your request

Update a service page.

→
Preview

AI drafts, you review.

→
Publish

Static page goes live.

Static build

HTML, CSS and only the scripts the page needs

Edge delivery

Deployed through Cloudflare Pages for low-latency visits

Accessibility review

Labels, alt text, focus states, contrast and mobile tap targets

Performance review

Page weight, layout stability and mobile fit checked before publish

The website should not become another stack to babysit.

A conventional CMS may be useful, but it can also bring plugin maintenance, permissions, upgrades and a public runtime to watch. A static export alone avoids some of that work but can make routine updates painful. Pocketloom separates the published site from the editing workflow.

Built for the people who visit, edit and maintain it.

Choose the content that needs simple controls, keep the public pages static and make larger changes visible before they go live.

Static published pages

Approved source and content produce a versioned build. The public page does not need a CMS database query on each request.

Focused CMS fields

Set up the edits your team and client actually make, such as staff, services, images and menus, without exposing the whole site structure.

Reviewable change requests

An agent can prepare a larger change against the site and its content. Your team sees the private preview and approves publication.

Clear ownership

Know which files, content, integrations and services the site depends on. Agree on the cutover and rollback before replacing a live site.

How the first site earns its place.

Prove the operating change on a representative site before deciding whether a wider portfolio should move.

01

Map the current site

Identify content types, forms, third-party services, hosting and the requests that create support work.

02

Build a private static version

Rebuild the site with the editing fields it needs and list any integrations that must remain separate services.

03

Run real edit requests

Check simple CMS edits and an agent-prepared change through preview, correction and approval.

04

Cut over only when ready

Confirm forms, analytics, accessibility, monitoring and rollback before a public switch.

One site can prove a better way to run the portfolio.

The test is not whether a preview looks good. Compare support time, incidents and request turnaround on the migrated site, then decide which other sites are suitable.

Not every site should move.

Complex applications or business-critical CMS integrations require a dependency review. The editor, forms, builds and connected services still need backups and monitoring. We identify these limits before recommending a migration.

Map my site fleet →

Find the first site worth moving.

Send your agency URL. Get a first-pass view of which public client sites may be worth moving and what we would check first.

Map my site fleet →